Friday, April 9, 2010

The Internet represents total freedom to access any information for most
American users. As a user, we also have the opportunity to put specific
restrictions on the sites we visit. For example, parents can put blocks
requiring passwords on pornographic sites so their children can’t visit
them. Schools can restrict sites that don’t relate to education. The
ability to implement these types of restrictions should represent enough
control to keep worried users content. Yet there are people who believe
that all Internet service providers should all be controlled with the same
rules and regulations. This idea of “Net Neutrality” would eliminate
certain freedoms we as Americans have. It would limit our choices of which
ISPs we use, what websites we can visit, how much we would pay, and
ultimately end our “freedom to access any information.” Net Neutrality
would jeopardize our Democracy by using government regulations and
eliminating certain freedoms that most Americans won’t stand for. America
is a land of choices because of our extreme differences; what one person
likes, another will dislike, and there is no possible way everyone will be
happy with only one choice. But with our capitalistic ways, a neutral
Internet doesn’t seem too far out of the picture and heated debate will
likely happen for the next couple of years.

No comments:

Post a Comment